Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 15:06

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Nintendo Switch 2 Size Comparison vs. Original Switch vs. Steam Deck - Gizmodo
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Willi Castro homers twice, Royce Lewis ends skid as Twins crush Athletics - Sports Illustrated
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Do you as a gay male enjoy the feeling of getting a penis in your anus?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Do you wear tights for warmth or to make your legs look better?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Taylor Swift Dons a Corseted Bodysuit for NYC Date Night with Travis Kelce - instyle.com